The House passed their version of the Education budget last
night. The bill cuts about $1.1 billion out of education. In
reviewing the final, bill the minimum amount of damage this bill will do
is a $170 cut plus 3.5% reduction in per pupil foundation allowance (a
permanent adjustment) which puts us at about a $428 per pupil cut. This
does not include cuts in categorical funds will be an additional cut.
The Senate Education budget includes $280 cut and additional cuts in
categorical funds, so somewhere in the $300 per pupil cut range.
The House and Senate now must decide
whether to go into conference, or to negotiate and decide which bill
will move forward as the final piece of legislation. IF THEY DO NOT HEAR
FROM PEOPLE THEY WILL ASSUME ALL IS OK AND WILL MOVE FORWARD WITHOUT
ANY ADJUSTMENTS. I believe they will choose to stay out of conference
committee and negotiations will occur over the weekend - so the time is
short and the window of opportunity to have any influence will close
quickly.
Some things to consider:
- Revenue reports due to be
out next week will likely show there is more money available than
originally assumed - making these cuts unnecessary.
- $1.8 Billion of the budget deficit is created by the Republican legislators having cut business taxes by 86%.
- The K-12 fund was raided and diverted from K-12 schools to the state’s general fund budget to pay for the massive tax cuts for businesses.
- Had the K-12 not been
raided, it would have restored last year’s $170 cut and provided up to
$400 additional per pupil funding this year.
Our schools and our children’s education depend on proper funding. Please make your voice heard.
Contact your representative
HOUSE BILLS 4465 TO 4466
In an attempt to unfairly attack the
rights of teachers, the Michigan House of Representatives introduced
H.B. 4465 and H.B. 4466 which severely increases the penalties for
teachers engaging in strike activities. H.B. 4465 creates a law that
mandates the loss of teachers’ certificates or fire any teacher involved
in a strike action. H.B. 4466 would mandate a decertification vote on
any labor union involved in a strike action. Not only does this impair
the due process rights of teachers by giving no appeal process or
grievance procedure but it also removes the people’s voice.
The choice of whether or not to call
for a union decertification vote, and the choice of which labor
organization will represent workers, is done through the democratic
process of a vote of the employees. This bill will replace the
democratic process with a state mandate (sound familiar?). Once again,
our Republican state legislators have introduced another bill that is an
attack on workers and working families. This is the typical response by
this legislature to any opposition to their “reform plan.” When workers
voice opposition to their policies, they respond with big government
controls.
This bill is not about helping the
budget get back on track, this is a bald-faced attempt to silence the
voice of Michigan’s teachers.
Contact your representative - tell him/her to VOTE NO on HB4465-HB4466
This legislation, introduced by
Representative Mike Shirkey (R-65), prohibits public employers from
using resources to assist a labor organization in collecting dues or
service fees from the wages of public employees. This bill is not about
the budget or any cost savings for state or local government. It is
about denying unions the dues collection process; and it is a flat-out
attack on unions. H.B. 4588 orders politically motivated and
discriminatory actions against labor unions and their members. This
issue did not arise from dues paying members – it was initiated by
Republican representatives who, with their corporate CEO constituents,
are working harder than ever to silence the voice of unions and
hard-working families.
Unions are the last line of defense
in the fight for corporate takeover of governmental services. Weakening
unions opens the door to privatizing public services resulting in
eliminating workers’ rights, lowering wages and benefits and using
taxpayer dollars to increase corporate profits. We have seen similar
concerted attacks in Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, Maine, and dozens of
other states across the country. These attacks are not about the budget –
our representatives have tried to pass off a
CEO-driven political agenda as a budget issue. They’ve voted for massive
tax cuts for the wealthy and for Wall Street at the expense of seniors,
children, working families and people with disabilities.
H.B. 4458
is not about costs or savings; Payroll deduction for union dues bears no
administrative costs to the employer. It is not any different than a
payroll deduction for employee health insurance contributions or
charitable deductions such as the United Way. H.B. 4458 is designed to
impose a burden on unions and working families.
Contact your representative - tell him/her to VOTE NO on HB 4458
Budget Reform Bills
It’s been called “Reaganomics”, “trickle-down economics” and “supply-side economics”.
It doesn’t matter what you call it – it just doesn’t work! It has been
applied rather unsuccessfully this past decade with the advent of the
Bush tax cuts, pushing our economy into higher levels of debt,
unemployment and poverty. It is often said that “history repeats
itself,” but the lesson has not been learned for our Republican
legislators. These bills will give $1.8 billion in corporate and
business tax cuts at the expense of public education, students and
teachers, impoverished families and retirees. It is often said that this
bill is a Robin Hood in reverse: “Taking from the poor, and giving to
the rich.” Let’s look at how that breaks down:
TAKES FROM THE POOR:
- Cuts to Public Education
- Cuts to Police, Fire and Other Community Services
- Tax on Retirees Pension
- Elimination of EITC for the Working Poor
- Elimination of the City Income Tax Credit
- Elimination of the Child Tax Credit
- Elimination of the Community Foundations Credit
- Elimination the Homeless Shelter/Food Bank Credit
- Elimination the Public Contributions Credit
- Elimination the College Tuition and Fees Credit
GIVES TO THE RICH:
- Elimination of Michigan Business Tax will result in 86% reduction in taxes paid by Business
- 2/3 of Business will Pay No Taxes At All
In other news:
Local school board elections were held on May 3rd, and 18 out of 24
of our endorsed candidates won their election (or re-election.) We
would like to give a shout out to ALL endorsed candidates (bolded names
are wins):
- Sonya Brown - Albion Public Schools
- Shawnette Spicer - Albion Public Schools
- Mike Smith - Bedford Public Schools
- Wayne Meehgan - Bedford Public Schools
- George Sobah - Chippewa Valley Public Schools
- Denise Aquino - Chippewa Valley Public Schools
- Benjamin Gillette - Fruitport Public Schools
- Steve Keglovitz - Fruitport Public Schools
- Monica Randles - Grand Rapids Public
- Raynard Ross - Grand Rapids Public
- Ed Luttrell - Holton Public Schools
- Jennifer Pollard - Kalamazoo Public Schools
- Mark Totten - Kalamazoo Public Schools
- Terrie Campbell - Lake Orion School District
- Zack Mason - Mar Lee School District
- George Seifert - Marshall Public School
- Michele Ready-Israel - Port Huron Area Schools
- William Orr - Port Huron Area Schools
- Gene Kilda - Utica Public Schools
- Ken Krolsyk - Utica Public Schools
- Megan Papasian-Broadwell - Warren Consolidated School District
- Fred Sebulske - Grand Rapids Community College
- Steve Claywell - Kellogg Community College
- Pam Faris - Mott College
|
Senate Bill 14, sponsored by Republican State
Senator Mark Jansen, will repeal the Michigan Health and Safety Act
(MIOSHA) in favor of a federal OSHA program. The elimination
of MIOSHA would be a significant step backward for workplace health and
safety in Michigan. During a time when job creation and sustainability
is so important for Michigan, our lawmakers continue to divert their
attention to issues that are simply political payback for greedy
corporate CEOs. Repealing MIOSHA will not help Michigan. Over a half
million workers will not be covered under a federal OSHA program, and
Michigan will receive substantially less amounts of money to keep our
workers safe on the job. At MIOSHA’s current funding level, resources
are spent on continuing the occupational safety and health regulations,
enforcement, education, training and consultation that has made
Michigan a national leader in workplace safety and health. All of these
programs will be severely cut if a federal program is implemented.
Because of MIOSHA, Michigan workplaces and workers are now among the safest in the nation.
What can you do to help stop this legislation?
We need workers across Michigan to write in to their state senator and oppose SB-14.
Let your representatives know the importance of MIOSHA. Our state is
one of the best in preventing occupational injuries and deaths, and we
intend to keep it that way.
|
|
Also, write in to your local newspaper and express your concerns regarding SB-14.
The general public is unaware of what the repeal of MIOSHA will mean
for all of Michigan. Keeping workers safe on the job is MIOSHA’s main
priority – and they’re one of the best in the business.
In Solidarity,
Michigan AFL-CIO
Tips on Writing to Congress
Remember that telephone calls are usually taken by a staff member, not the member of Congress. Ask to speak with the aide who handles the issue about which you wish to comment. They are here to help you solve the problem or help you understand the senators and representatives point of view. Learn more about the bill and its amendments.
After you have indefinite yourself and your district on which you live, tell the aide you would like to leave a brief message, such as: "Please tell Senator/Representative (Name) that I support/oppose (S.___/H.R.___)."
You will also want to state reasons for your support or opposition to the bill. Ask for your senators' or representative's position on the bill. You may also request a written response to your telephone call. You can also ask for a meeting or go to a caucus meeting.
Tips On Writing Congress
The letter is the most popular choice of communication with a congressional office. If you decide to write a letter, this list of helpful suggestions will improve the effectiveness of the letter:
Your purpose for writing should be stated in the first paragraph of the letter. If your letter pertains to a specific piece of legislation, identify it accordingly, e.g., House bill: H. R. ____, Senate bill: S.____.
Be courteous, to the point, and include key information, using examples to support your position.
Address only one issue in each letter; and, if possible, keep the letter to one page.
Addressing Correspondence:
To a Senator:
The Honorable (full name)
__(Rm.#)__(name of)Senate Office Building
United States Senate
Washington, DC20510
Dear Senator:
To a Representative:
The Honorable (full name)
__(Rm.#)__(name of)House Office Building
United States House of Representatives
Washington, DC20515
Dear Representative:
Note:When writing to the Chair of a Committee or the Speaker of the House, it is proper to address them as:
Dear Mr. Chairman or Madam Chairwoman:
or Dear Mr. Speaker:
Tips On E-mailing Congress
Generally, the same guidelines apply as with writing letters to Congress. You may find and e-mail your senators and representative directly from this Web site.
Most of the information that has been provided by http://www.uwua.org